Natasha Irani vs Charlotte Petrick Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L L W L L
Form
W W L W L L W L L LHead-To-Head: Irani 1 - 0 Petrick
They have played 2 sets in total, with Irani winning 2 and Petrick winning 0. The last match between Irani and Petrick was at the Gatineau, 08-08-2016, Q1 round, Hard with Natasha Irani getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Natasha Irani | 1 |
| Charlotte Petrick | 0 |
Gatineau(08-08-2016)
6
4
6
1
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Medvedev VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Khachanov VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Natasha Irani Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats 
Polona Hercog
Player
Natasha Irani
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Charlotte Petrick Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Kana Daniel
Player
Charlotte Petrick
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charlotte Petrick
Player
Shelby Talcott
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Failla
Player
Charlotte Petrick
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Amy Zhu
Player
Charlotte Petrick
52%
(
56 of
107)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
94)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59%
(
30 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
111
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 5-7 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 40% (4/6) | Win/Loss | 41% (37/53) |
| 36% (8/14) | Sets Win/Loss | 44% (90/115) |
| 42% (79/107) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (887/953) |
| 57% (4/3) | Hard Win/Loss | 43% (13/17) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 48% (19/21) |
| 0% (0/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (5/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 8 |
| 0.08 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.03 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 27 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 652.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 407.96 |
| 58% (33/57) | 1st Serve % | 59% (274/464) |
| 64% (21/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (144/274) |
| 21% (5/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (79/190) |
| 0% (0/1) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (22/57) |
| 31% (14/45) | Return Points Win % | 42% (198/477) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (4/5) | Challenger W/L | 21% (7/26) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 56% (30/24) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 41% (36/88) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (9/20) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (10/26) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (37/31) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (37/6) |
| 25% (8/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (52/6) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
